Elmhurst College vs Elmhurst University should not be a conversation our campus should be having, at least not right now.
We need to talk about how we can set the campus up to be worthy of the prospective students we are trying to appeal to, not just rebranding or structural changes.
If we are going to market ourselves as a university to rope in future students and international students, we need to take care of our own students first. We need to take care of our campus.
We need to be talking about the new living spaces such as True Colors or Honors housing, and how Honors has an air conditioned space, and True Colors does not.
We need to talk about how we can prevent another student experiencing heat stroke in their own dorm and having to be moved within the first few weeks of the fall semester.
We need to be talking about the older buildings on campus that flood, and the outdated classrooms all across campus.
Why does Circle Hall have smart classrooms for majors like psychology and speech pathology, yet art majors are still having to use chalkboards in Old Main?
We need to talk about our bad retention. Why are students not returning? We have a big enrollment, but it means nothing if those same students are not following the path to become graduates of EC.
It seems that all these issues are being tabled for the name change discussion and who will pay for the rebranding of the campus (which will probably be students in the end), as well as the timeline of when these changes will happen.
There is so much information hidden from the average student, and that is wrong. The everyday student deserves to know when the Board of Trustees talk about tuition increases, and what the numbers look like beforehand, not after the vote is already placed.
We should not be focusing on whether or not EC should change its name while at the same time, EC rarely involves students in decisions such as this.
EC feels like it is more focused on the quantity of students it brings in rather than the quality of campus and resources it provides once they arrive and become settled.
The campus has moved too fast on the vote and provided little time for student feedback.
The Board of Trustees members are supposed to vote on the name change March 16, and we just recently got the survey for our opinions on the idea.
The only ethical step would be for the Board of Trustees to table the discussion until student responses have been considered.
We have students who are being put at a disadvantage of the campus because of our mediocre buildings and resources, and all EC seems to be thinking about is how we can bring more students in when we barely are helping the ones we already have.
Our priorities need to change before we think about changing our name. We need to table this discussion.